UPDATE post-publication: Someone from Facebook reached out to me by email and offered to correct the issue with my page, which had been incorrectly suspended by their algorithm/AI. The problem has been sorted out now. I appreciate Facebook reaching out to me. I do hope, though, that their algorithm is improved so issues like this can be prevented from happening in the first place.
A few days ago I left Twitter, despite having 20K followers there. This was not an abrupt decision, but one I have been seriously considering for well over a year. After Twitter was acquired and turned into a private company, I noticed significant changes over the months and years that followed. Any post with even a very slight political take would attract hordes of crass, obnoxious replies from accounts that didn't follow me. Many were likely bots, but not all. In my experience, the broader community there has turned rather vulgar, so eventually it became impractical to moderate my presence to keep it minimally civil. And then, recent changes made it possible for blocked users to again see my posts, rendering moderation even harder. That was the final straw for me; I kept my account going until the US election, to reach people until that crucial moment, but no longer. I regret leaving my 20K followers, but you have alternatives to keep following my work.
As if by synchronicity, only a couple of days after my leaving Twitter, Facebook suspended my 'Bernardo Kastrup' page without any explanation as to why. On the announcement of the suspension, there was a link called 'More details.' Clicking on it, however, briefly opened an empty window that closed automatically in less than a second. I tried it in multiple computers, with multiple browsers and operating systems, but with no change. There was an option to protest Facebook's decision, but every time I tried to submit my protest, I'd get the message: "We cannot process your request at this time." This went on for over 24h until I gave up. Eventually, I found out how to check my page status elsewhere, getting the screen below:
Contradictorily, the screen says that my page was suspended due to violations of community standards, but also gives me the "good news" that my page has no violations of community standards! Clicking on either link from the "Your page has been suspended" lines does not clarify the problem. At some point a pop-up window highlights specifically that impersonating someone else is a violation of community standards. This suggests that Facebook thinks that I am impersonating Bernardo Kastrup (!), but even that isn't quite clear. Thinking of it, I had indeed updated my profile photo just before the suspension, using (with authorisation) professional photos originally made for an article in a French magazine. Perhaps Facebook's AI thought I was impersonating the famous Bernardo Kastrup from the French magazine! Be that as it may, there is no way to contact a person to clarify the issue. If Facebook's AI thinks you violated something, they suspend your account without an explanation and there's nothing you can do about it, other than fill out a 'feedback' form that will most-likely just add to some statistics, but not be read by a human. There's just no reasonable recourse, for the process is entirely opaque and rather arbitrary.
I had had some weird issues with Facebook in the previous weeks. Twice Facebook cancelled my sharing of posts by Essentia Foundation because apparently I had shared pornography (!). I laughed it off and didn't make an issue of it. But now I realise that those events were harbingers of things to come.
So I have been effectively forced to leave Facebook, and thus decided to leave all other Meta platforms as well, including my newly-created accounts on Instagram and Threads. This is not because of any political or activist position against Meta, or even as a protest against what happened (I can't get mad at mere AI), but because I simply do not trust those platforms and do not want to spend the significant effort required to (re-)build a following there just to see my accounts arbitrarily suspended in a couple of years. It makes no sense for me to build up an initial presence on Threads or Instagram, or to start a new Facebook page.
I left Twitter because it has become a wild-west due to lack of moderation and enforcement of community standards; it became a downright rude, obnoxious, unsafe space. So I support community standards enforcement, as Facebook tries to do. But then, the enforcement should be minimally logical and transparent, not ridiculously arbitrary and opaque as it turns out to be. Twitter and Facebook are now at opposite extremes of a spectrum, neither of which makes it minimally attractive for me to build or maintain a presence there. Neither seems to be reliable, or even viable, anymore as a platform for a (small) public figure to engage their audience.
I am still active on my relatively large YouTube community, BlueSky, Mastodon and LinkedIn. The latter one I use only for posts related to my technology and business activities, not philosophy. I am considering re-starting a discussion forum/community to replace my Twitter/Facebook presence. Such a forum/community would (will?) be owned by me and run on private servers not subject to third-party control. If (when?) I go ahead with this, you will hear it here and in my remaining social media platforms. I also plan to become much more active on my YouTube channel, cultivating a larger community there in the coming months. I'll be doing live community events, such as Ask-Me-Anythings (AMAs), starting from next year. I will also make more use of this blog for community related messages, such as this one. Notice that you can always check this page to see updates to my social media presence, including new platforms, as they come online. 2025 will be refreshing and exciting, a vigorous new start to my online presence, more focused on community building and more direct interactions between me and my audience.
I sense a synchronistic ethos behind my misadventures with social media. Just as my new book comes out, events push me away from the superficiality and brevity of social media, to more thoughtful, in-depth, content-rich spaces such as this blog, YouTube (the latter of which I plan, again, to make much more extensive use of starting next year), and a potential forum/community. I accept that this is what life is pushing me towards, and will happily act accordingly.
I really love your work and all that you have done to help idealism become more mainstream!
ReplyDeleteHowever, I feel that many people including myself feel that you might be going a bit too far into politics as you are a philosopher of mind and its why we love you because of your work on idealism not because of politics. To me it feels a bit like when certain scientists try to talk about philosophy like NDT or Stephen hawking (to be clear I'm not saying you are to the same extent as these figures in regard to politics).
I personally feel that you do best when you focus on your expertise. Anyways, I can't wait for your future writings/works on philosophy!
Historically, philosophers have never backed away from politics; much to the contrary. It is the responsibility of public intellectuals to pitch in, for politics is the art of living together and public intellectuals have something of substance to say. I am part of society. I see the present times as incredibly significant and dangerous; more dangerous than anything before in history. It is thus my responsibility as a public intellectual to share my views in this regard. At any rate, it is certainly MY RIGHT to do so. If you don't like this part of what I have to say, ignore it and focus on what you like. But don't tell me what I should or should not do. Finally, my political commentary has been quite limited relative to the rest of my output, taking place only in the final days of the election, next to only one political essay currently published in my blog. To say that I went too far into politics is a peculiar, and factually wrong, position.
DeleteYes, you are right about philosophers and politics, and I understand that philosophers and scientists do get involved with politics (for good reason sometimes like global warming). You are absolutely right that it is your RIGHT, I never once said it wasn't. I also never once said "you can't talk about politics" I am not telling you what to do. I was simply voicing my concerns and my opinion, nor would I want to control what you do or don't do. But I've seen many people on some discords/twitter think you left twitter directly because of Trump winning the election. I agree that it has been limited, it is just concerning to see people think you are a politician instead of a philosopher since leaving twitter (analytical idealism needs a voice on mainstream social media, it would have such a positive impact on the world in my opinion!) However, I am sorry If I came across as rude or annoying, I am a huge fan, and your work has changed my life positively! Thank you for that!
DeleteMy leaving Twitter had been decided on the day Twitter announced that blocked accounts could still see my feed. And I had been considering the possibility of leaving for over a year before that. Whoever would win the election, my leaving was decided, that being the reason everything happened so fast, including other, yet unannounced social media accounts of mine. As for what people on Discord think of my behaviour, they are entitled to their views, but they're not really a concern for me. There will be always people in the wilds of the Internet who think anything about anyone. My sense of moral responsibility in face of proto-fascism in this critical time in human history compelled me to share opinions I held, and hold, strongly. What people will make of it is their problem, not mine.
DeleteThat makes a lot of sense, for leaving twitter thanks for clarifying. I guess many people are sadly just too lazy to look up what actually happened, and they just listen to incorrect information...I think it's great what you are doing, and I agree with you on what your political views seem to be. Sadly, people just like to twist what happened... hopefully this misinformation will die out. Christof Koch is actually a great example of a powerful intellectual who doesn't have much social media and still has great influence. So hopefully, this fearmongering about you leaving twitter will stop. But like you said it is their problem not yours.
DeleteGood news about a possible new forum. I hope you decide to go ahead with that.
ReplyDeleteAgreed, a forum focused on this community would have a big potential upside. I would enjoy connecting around idealism in a healthy and authentic space.
ReplyDeleteI very much appreciate the YouTube long form content. Have also found Substack to be a healthy space generally by contrast.
We all have to constantly flow with and reevaluate the evolving media world around us. Building this space vs reliance on external platforms is worth some thought.
Gordon R. Dickson, author of Computers Don't Argue*, would be bitterly proud.
ReplyDelete[*A short story where a guy trying to return the book Kidnapped by Rudyard Kipling is eventually executed for kidnapping and murder.]
I run a digital agency, and my daemon has been pushing me create a twitter like platform that promotes productive conversation and consensus through new engagement mechanisms. Like and follow are not good enough. I’m thinking of engagement mechanisms such as support/challenge (with corresponding arguments that can themselves be challenged) , promote/suppress (votes to manually nudge the algorithm) , accept/contest (to quantify the finality of a position), Maybe reward / penalize ( conditional consequences based on outcomes to encourage vigorous honest debates that rewards great thinkers and discourages bad actors). Etc…
ReplyDeleteI’d love to have a reputation system that adds or removes the weight of a users engagement based on their relevance to that topic and their reputation overall.
I’ve been dreaming of a social media platform where the greatest ideas bubble up systematically and allow a transparent view into the reasoning behind the idea, an environment where disinformation and lies just naturally die quickly.
And I’d love to make these ideas as easy to share and spread as a tweet.
Could it be that Meta's AI bots suspended BK's account because they are irked by his claim that they can't be conscious, as--contrary to bats-- there is nothing it is like to be a bot ;)
ReplyDeleteAhh! I have missed the once and future moderator’s wit (indeed, does a digital computer think there is something it is like to be a bit?) And are you still getting up at 6am to paint the inner soul mistily peeking through the outward forms of Nature?
DeleteMy dear Ben, the sentiment is mutual. Perchance we'll playfully wittle away at each other again in some new offspring of Metaphysical Speculations that Metakastrup never quite fostered. While this spiritual hobo does awaken into the daze of one's life at the first signs of daylight, alas the detour-like signs of corporeal aging occlude a daily trek into the wilds of Nature. Now those peek encounters happen more through the forms of the Imaginal--one no more nor less wondrous than the other ...Cheers
DeleteHello Bernardo
ReplyDeleteLooking forward to what is coming!
May I ask you make an updated post with recent advancements in Quantum Mechanics and their implications? As the older post seem to be nearly from a lot of years ago.
For instance, I read an article in Scientific American by you and Henry Stapp that mentioned QM rules apply at all scales and that what makes them become classical is measurement or consciousness.
Does this study prove this wrong? or what does this study say exactly?
https://physicsworld.com/a/quantum-error-correction-research-yields-unexpected-quantum-gravity-insights/
Cheers